Using ChatGPT and Midjourney, Rishi created drafts of text and images that would weave together a story that would show kids the magic of AI, as he presents it. Both programs, free at least for a trial period, require the user to type a prompt that can then be recreated through images or text.
The end result is impressive for anyone unfamiliar with AI but is often far from perfect: images appear with strange distortions—in Rishi’s case, Black eyes and 12 fingers – and the text generated by ChatGPT can contain flaws and errors that remind us that AI is not coffee Insan Rishi spent hours upon hours revising and editing the texts created for the book, and he rejected the criticism that all he was doing was “pushing a button”.
He has sold more than 900 copies of his book “Alice and the Sparkle” on Amazon in early December. But a look at the reviews — 60 percent 5 stars and 40 percent 1 stars — as well as his Twitter mentions suggest a growing divide about these tools as people consider whether they’ll make the starving artist hungry, or if They are moral. all
“The man who made it [this] Not a ‘writer,’ nor is he an ‘illustrator,’ yet in his bio above he claims he writes,” wrote one Amazon reviewer. “Our world is turning into a joke.”
AI can now create any image in seconds, bringing surprise and danger
Rishi doesn’t hate technology, but he understands why some might be concerned.
“With any new technology that’s incredibly powerful, it’s a threat to some people,” he said. He added: “You see people wondering, ‘Is this going to change my job?’ … This concern – we must not pretend that it is not serious.
One of the main complaints about AI art, for example, is that some tools seem to learn from art data sets created by real people – with real copyright protection – to make these computer-generated creations. Prepare food for
Rishi doesn’t have an answer for that: “People say, ‘Well, if this model is trained on my artwork, and my artwork is copyrighted, is that right or legal?’ But then I think you’re going to get into this philosophical discussion, which is how it differs from human learning [about] Their favorite artist or someone drawing Batman fan art? One could argue that computers are doing the same thing here. “I don’t have a very firm position here yet,” he adds.
Already, AI has made its way into the creative world. Last summer, a Colorado man won the state fair art contest with a painting he created about the Medjorni. In November, the Lensa app launched a new feature that sent AI selfies flooding social media feeds. A comedy robot built by an Oregon State University professor has begun learning how to count people in crowds and tell pre-written jokes. Shudu, “the world’s first digital supermodel,” was created through artificial intelligence and used in a Louis Vuitton ad.
Some top manufacturers have made their disdain for this technology clear. Australian singer Nick Cave recently called ChatGPT an exercise in “duplication as stalking” — and wrote a song in his style “a weird joke about being human.” During a presentation on artificial intelligence, renowned animator and Studio Ghibli co-founder Hayao Miyazaki referred to the technology as “An affront to life itself“
ChatbotGPT worries teachers trying to detect cheating by AI
Online, artists have also joined together to digitally protest AI-generated art. Last month, many came out against the platform Art Station after AI-generated images appeared on the site. A protest photo asked AI users to “pick up a crayon like the others.”
Earlier this week, a US law firm announced a class action lawsuit against Midgerny, Stability AI and DeviantArt, claiming that “billions of copyrighted images” were used in the data “without the permission of the artists.” or consent.”
“AI image products are not just a violation of artists’ rights; whether they are intentional or not, these products will eliminate the ‘artist’ as a viable profession,” said a statement from the Joseph Shadow Law Firm. It added, “If music streaming can be done in law, so can AI products.” The law firm did not respond to interview requests from the Post.
Nick Thompson, a human-computer interaction expert at Curtin University in Australia. He said he’s heard of cases where the real artist’s signature has appeared on AI-generated images, and that creators are “rightfully upset about it.”
“The thing is, the cat is out of the bag and there’s no going back, so I don’t think the case is that these platforms will continue to grow and collect as much data as they can,” he said. “It will continue.”
Thompson believes many are underestimating the current level of sophistication in AI programs such as ChatGPT or Midjourney, both of which were released in the past year. He said artificial intelligence is really just “a model of intelligence” — it can’t think like a real human.
“In time, we will realize that it is not as exciting as it seems,” he said. “… I want to believe that discerning consumers who appreciate art and creativity will still be able to notice the difference and be drawn to the work of creatives.”
After an explosive backlash on Twitter, Rishi “greased himself” before sharing his latest personal project with the public — a fictional, animated Batman video he put together using an edited version of a script he wrote. Created on ChatGPT. He created images in Midjourney, scaled them up to larger resolutions using AI functions in Pixelmator, and then recorded himself as a voiceover, which he edited using Adobe AI tools. . He edited the video in the phone app Motion Leap.
“I’ve seen claims that it will replace storyboard artists,” he said. “I really don’t agree with that view.”
Although he admits that he may be too optimistic, he said that he hopes that professional builders will also use these tools. Storyboarding artists or illustrators can test their ideas by creating them with AI and then use their hard-earned results to create a better product, he said. Amateur creators may also use these AI tools to help them achieve their visions, as he did with his Batman video, he said.
As it stands, amateur video game developers began looking to the medium to create game assets and graphics, while others used the program to brainstorm visuals for an indie board game.
“A lot of people see this as empowering the new creator — kids who can’t draw or write a story well, now they can jump in and jump into it,” he said. “I see it as equal in many ways.”