Art Station Probably the most important website on the entire Internet for professional artists, especially those working in entertainment fields such as video games (Most of us Beautiful arts Links, for example, point there). This is why the site’s constant customization of AI-generated images has become a point of contention with its users.
Technology, which has been corrupted to its core, is a particular concern for a community that creates the art of living, and likewise should be a concern for the companies responsible for owning and hosting that community. But until today, Art Station No policy directly restricts hosting or displaying AI-generated images on the site, which has led to repeated instances where images created by computers, not humans, have come to the fore. Art Station The “Explore” section, the most popular way to showcase artists’ work.
That is, it is understandable Making a lot of people angry. In fact, over the past 24 hours many artists have been so enraged by the site’s AI-generated reactions that they’ve started spamming their portfolios, with protests. Painter Nicholas Cole and a clothing designer Imogen Chais As a result of this Art Station The front page looks like this at the time of writing:
It’s just the same picture, basically Created by Alexander Nanichkov And saying “No AI generated images”, has been repeatedly pasted by hundreds of artists:
These artists have every right to be upset! AI-generated image overload can trash any website, but allowing it on a site designed specifically to showcase the work of talented human artists is a particularly bad idea.
“ArtStation’s content guidelines do not prohibit the use of AI tools in the process of creating artwork that is shared with the community,” a spokesperson for Epic Games, the owners, said. Art Stationsays Kotaku. “he said, Art Station Portfolio is a platform designed to enhance and celebrate originality powered by a community of artists. Users’ portfolios should only contain the artwork they create, and we encourage users to be transparent in the process. Our content guidelines are over here“
While this is an expected response given the proliferation of AI-generated imagery on the site, and the apparent lack of moderation involved in their stay, Epic also says that they “have nothing to do with companies does not agree to allow them to scrape content on our site. Website If AI companies do so without permission and beyond purely academic use (where appropriate copyright can be used), they may Violate the rights of Art Station creators.
Epic also says that they are “in the process of giving Art Station users more control over how their work is shared and labeled, and we will provide more details in the near future.”
While this veiled legal threat is probably a sign that Epic isn’t as good with the process as it seems, and word that user controls are coming in the “near future” is somewhat promising, it’s not the truth. changes that Art Station User portfolios are already being fed to these AIs, and it will do nothing in the short term to stop AI-generated images from encroaching on websites that are supposed to display the best in human art. .
For now, the best way to detect and ignore AI-generated imagery (or even better, to report) is the same as the last few months: always ask to see the fingers.